✏️

Editorial Policy

Last reviewed August 2026

Independence

Our editorial decisions are made entirely by our editorial team, free from the influence of advertisers, funders, or external parties. Commercial relationships have no bearing on what we choose to cover or how we cover it.

No sponsor, advertiser, or financial backer has any influence over our editorial content.

Accuracy

We strive to ensure all published information is accurate and verified. Our editors and research desks check material claims before publication. Where errors occur, we correct them promptly and transparently.

  • Claims are verified against reliable sources before publication
  • Statistics and data are attributed to their original sources
  • Corrections are published clearly and without delay
  • Speculation is clearly labelled as such

Impartiality

On matters of public controversy and political debate, we present a fair range of perspectives. We do not take sides in party-political matters, and contributors must distinguish personal interpretation from established facts.

Commentary and opinion posts are clearly labelled and distinguished from sourced explainers.

Sourcing

We identify our sources wherever possible. When sources request anonymity, we consider the public interest carefully and apply it only where necessary. We do not publish unverified claims or rumour as fact.

Harm and Sensitivity

We recognise the potential impact of our posts on individuals and communities. We approach sensitive topics — including crime, mental health, and tragedy — with care, and follow appropriate guidance on responsible writing and source use.

Complaints

Readers who believe our content has fallen short of these standards are encouraged to contact the editorial team. We take all complaints seriously and respond in a timely manner.

Editorial Enquiries

To raise a concern about our editorial standards, please contact:
editorial@theopenknowledge.com